SEATTLE TIMES NEGOTIATIONS UPDATE #6 By PATTY WARREN, Organizer
In addition to losing our transportation work, the Times has proposed that we voluntarily give up our four ad service drivers that work out of Fairview. They are not directly impacted by the outsourcing, but the Times wants rid of Local 174 and has proposed we relinquish those jobs to Local 763.
P-I Warned on risk of strike! click for more Good News:
Bad News:
The Union made two proposals at today’s meeting: FIRST, we proposed a new 3-year agreement. We included a proposal for a labor-management committee which would be charged with finding ways to increase efficiencies with the current workforce. SECOND, we proposed a 30-day contract extension, but conditioned the proposal on the Times tabling their outsourcing proposal for 30 days to attempt to negotiate a new contract and keep you employed at the Seattle Times. Management said they would agree, provided we scheduled 10 bargaining sessions over that 30 day period. That would have been fine if they would agree to bargain a contract. But they wanted us to agree only the first 4 meetings would be contract negotiations, and the next 6 on their outsourcing proposal. They also did not want to establish a committee, but wanted us to bring our ideas to the bargaining table. It takes a lot of time to review the operation, come up with sound ideas, and figure out how to implement them. Impossible to accomplish in 4 meetings. We did not accept their counter. We left our proposal on the table and scheduled a follow-up meeting on February 6. We received a severance proposal from the Times. We will be carefully reviewing the offer. At initial glance, it appears that few employees would qualify. As always, we will keep you posted. NEGOTIATIONS UPDATE #3 JANUARY 4, 2008 Local 174 Business Agents Patty Warren and Michael Gonzales, the Union’s bargaining unit representatives, and Local 174’s legal counsel, Dmitri Iglitzin, met with Chris Biencourt and the rest of the Seattle Times’ management team from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on January 4, 2008, at the Fairview facility. Also present were representatives from Local 763 and International Representative John Peralta from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
At the meeting, the Times gave the Union a copy of the November 29, 2007, Letter of Intent it has entered into with Penske Logistics, confirming their intent to enter into a Logistics Agreement pursuant to which Penske would perform some of the work currently being performed by members of our bargaining unit. The Times also made a three-point proposal to the Union:
The Times has not promised to ensure that all Local 174-represented drivers will be hired by Penske, nor that Penske will honor any of the terms and conditions of employment which currently exist under the Times-Local 174 collective bargaining agreement. To the contrary, the Times made it clear, in the Letter of Intent, that “Penske will determine the material terms” of any offer it may choose to make to any driver, including “compensation, benefits, and working conditions.” Finally, the Times has not identified how much severance it is willing to pay to impacted Local 174 members nor which of our members it will be willing to pay that severance to (e.g., whether it will pay severance to all of our members, or only to those members who are not hired by Penske). Local 174 intends to respond to this very vague proposal by seeking additional information, such as a copy of Penske’s Dedicated Contract Carriage Proposal, which apparently spells out the precise services Penske would be providing to the Times. Local 174 also intends to attempt to meet with Penske representatives to learn more about the conditions of employment which would exist for our members if they were to go to work for that company. Finally, Local 174 intends to meet again with the Times on the earliest date that such a meeting would be useful and, at that time, we will make a counteroffer which we believe will better serve the interests of our members than the proposal given to us by the Times.
They asked us to sign a confidentiality agreement before they would provide us with a copy We responded with an information request. Important points:
AN OPEN LETTER TO TEAMSTER LOCAL 174 AND TEAMSTER LOCAL 763 MEMBERS You are all aware at this point the Seattle Times has announced it has signed a “Letter of Intent” with Penske to outsource the transportation of newspapers. The outsourcing would impact members of both Unions. Representatives of both Unions had a preliminary meeting with the Seattle Times last Friday, December 14. At that meeting, a lot of questions were asked, but the Times didn’t have many answers. The Unions wanted to know whether or not Penske had agreed to offer jobs to our members, on what basis would they be making their hiring decisions, if they were willing to sit down with us to discuss wages, pension, etc. The Unions were told those were not decisions for the Seattle Times to make, those were decisions for Penske. We told the Times the two Unions would talk and get back to them about dates for negotiations and the Unions would be sending them a written information request. John Peralta from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters delivered the message to the times in the strongest terms that the Teamsters were not interested in having our work outsourced. Since that meeting, Rick Hicks, Secretary-Treasurer of Local 174, and David Grage, Secretary-Treasurer of Local 763, have agreed that the two Unions will enter into joint negotiations with the Times. To that end, we have set an initial meeting for January 4. Both Unions will work together to produce the best possible result for our members, with the primary interest of keeping the work in house and keeping you all employed by the Times. We will continue to issue joint publications to keep you informed. On December 14, Secretary-Treasurer Rick Hicks, Business Agent Patty Warren, Organizer Michael Gonzales and Local 174’s Seattle Times bargaining committee members were joined by John G. Peralta, the International Representative for the Newspaper, Magazine & Electronic Media Workers Division of the IBT, and representatives of Teamsters Local 763 in our first meeting with the Seattle Times regarding the Times’ stated intention of outsourcing Local 174’s work, and drivers, to Penske. At the meeting, the Times was asked, point blank, whether it had already made a firm decision to outsource the bulk hauling of newspapers between its facilities. Chris Biencourt, Vice President of Labor Relations, speaking for the Times, stated that this was not the case. However, Chris made it clear that it believes that there are compelling reasons for the Times to take this step. Local 174 representatives expressed their very deep concern about the Times’ plan and asked a number of important questions, including questions about how Penske would deal with the Teamsters that it hired from the Times. Chris said that he had no knowledge about that. There were a number of other questions that he could not or did not answer. At this point, all of the Teamster representatives caucused without the Times representatives being present. We decided that we could not respond in any meaningful way to the Times’ November 30, 2007, letter to the Union declaring its intent to outsource our work without first receiving much more information from the Times than we currently have. Sometime in the next few weeks, we expect to sit down with the Times to commence bargaining on a successor collective bargaining agreement to the current one, which expires on February 28, 2007. Prior to the next meeting, we will have sent the Times a written request for the information we need regarding its outsourcing proposal. We will keep all members informed of all developments regarding our effort to obtain a new agreement with the Times that continues to cover both our bulk hauling and dispatch drivers. SEATTLE TIMES CONTRACT Ratified On Sunday July 1st 2007, Teamsters Local 174 members at the Seattle Times voted to accept a one year extension on the current contract. While no-one was happy with the final outcome, it was the unanimous recommendation of the committee to accept this compromise in order to break out of the two year freeze "pattern" and to preserve our current language for another year. Secretary-Treasurer Hicks told the members at the Seattle Times “We entered these negotiations with two major goals. First, we were not going to take a two year wage freeze like all the other crafts were doing. And second, we were going to break the cycle and have the opportunity for Local 174 to set the pattern so we would not be back in this situation again in the future. We accomplished both!” Thanks to Teamsters Local 763 for postponing their vote in order to give us an opportunity to meet with the Times and the International Union one final time. Their show of solidarity helped us reach a tentative agreement. We wish them well with their upcoming vote and pledge our support for their ongoing negotiations. And please extend your thanks to the negotiating committee for their time and patience. Bargaining Committee: Secretary-Treasurer Rick Hicks, Business Agents Patty Warren and Michael Gonzales, Rank & File members Jonathon Harris, Bill Phillips, Sam Taylor, Nate Wickliff, and Mike Tresslar SEATTLE TIMES CONTRACT VOTE With the assistance of the International, we reached a tentative agreement with the Seattle Times which extends our current contract by one year to February 28, 2008 with all current terms and conditions in place. While this means a one year wage freeze, it also means we have succeeded in getting out of the pattern set by the Times and have maintained our seniority provisions intact. The decision is yours. Please come and vote. NOTE: If this offer is rejected, the strike authorization remains in place. DATE: July 1, 2007 TIME: 2 P.M. PLACE: TEAMSTERS HALL Bargaining committee: Jonathan Harris, Sam Taylor, Nate Wickliff, Mike Tresslar, Bill Phillips, Negotiator Patty Warren and Organizer Michael Gonzales
We have agreed to go to Federal Mediation to attempt to resolve our differences. The Mediator was available on May 31, a previously scheduled bargaining date. We will be signing another one-month extension which will take us through the month of June. Thanks to the Times members who participated in the vote.
Chris Biencourt, spokesperson from the Times, has explained that many of their proposed language changes were not prompted by any actions taken by our bargaining unit, but rather are a response to things happening with other Unions. The Times is interested in having all the Unions agree to the same language—language that would strengthen their hand and weaken ours. We are not interested in going backwards, either in language or economics. The Union made its initial economic offer at the March 15 meeting. We proposed a three-year contract, with increases in wages and pension. We also reserved the right to propose an alternative medical plan and are analyzing plans and costs now. We expect management to respond to the economics at the next meeting. But given what we’ve heard so far, we are not expecting a favorable response. Local 763 has also started negotiations. They had their first meeting this week. When possible, a Local 174 representative will sit in on their bargaining. Let’s show management some solidarity, both at the bargaining table and on the shop floor! We are all in this together, and we wish the best for Local 763’s negotiations. Bargaining committee: Jonathan Harris, Sam Taylor, Nate Wickliff, Mike Tresslar, Bill Phillips, Negotiator Patty Warren and Organizer Michael Gonzales.
SEATTLE TIMES NEGOTIATIONS UPDATE #1 The meeting began with a discussion of future dates and times. The group agreed to meet on February 22 from 1 to 5 p.m. at the Union Hall and on February 27 from 1 to 5 p.m. at the North Creek facility The Union laid out the issues which will be covered by our proposal, including economics (wages, medical, pension, etc.) and non-economic items such as Safety and Drug Testing. We requested information on the Company’s long-term disability plan, and asked for a presentation on what has happened to with the cost and structure of the medical plan and what they see happening with the plan in the future. We also said we wanted to discuss the Company’s exercise of its discretion in the sick leave arena, an explanation of their policies on when to drug test, and needed to have a full discussion around the seniority layoff language. At the next session, the Union will be presenting a comprehensive proposal. Talk to your bargaining committee or call Patty Warren for more information. |